Radeon Pro V520 vs GeForce FX Go5100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.76
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNV34 A1Navi 12
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors45 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

Pro V520 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go5100 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go5100 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5100
GeForce FX Go5100
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.