Radeon Vega 6 Mobile vs GeForce FX Go 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV31MRaven-M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)8 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5384
Core clock speed1 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1101 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.42
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8456 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 8 January 2018
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Vega 6 Mobile has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5200 and Radeon Vega 6 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Mobile
Radeon Vega 6 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 41 vote

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.