ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce FX Go 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15521589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameNV31MRV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5no data
Core clock speed1 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX Go 5200 8
+300%
Samples: 29
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 150 nm 180 nm

FX Go 5200 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5200 and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 25 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX Go 5200 or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.