HD Graphics 405 vs GeForce FX Go 5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce FX Go 5200 and HD Graphics 405, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD Graphics 405 outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 3350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1559 | 1230 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.84 |
| Architecture | no data | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) |
| GPU code name | NV31M | Braswell GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2003 (22 years ago) | 1 April 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 6 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 9.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.1536 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 2 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 15 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−26.1%
|
27−30
+26.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−122%
|
20−22
+122%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−26.1%
|
27−30
+26.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−26.1%
|
27−30
+26.1%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 7−8 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 405 is 150% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics 405 performs better in 19 tests (70%)
- there's a draw in 8 tests (30%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.02 | 0.69 |
| Recency | 1 March 2003 | 1 April 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 14 nm |
HD Graphics 405 has a 3350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.
The HD Graphics 405 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
