GeForce 6600 GT AGP vs FX 5950 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1474not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.14no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNV38NV43 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2003 (21 years ago)14 November 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed475 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors135 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate3.8004.000
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed475 MHz475 MHz
Memory bandwidth30.4 GB/s15.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 14 November 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 47 Watt

FX 5950 Ultra has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

6600 GT AGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 57.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and GeForce 6600 GT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT AGP
GeForce 6600 GT AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 80 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 6600 GT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5950 Ultra or GeForce 6600 GT AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.