Matrox Parhelia 256 MB vs GeForce FX 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1509not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameNV35Parhelia-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 May 2003 (22 years ago)25 June 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors135 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate3.2000.8
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 4x
Length218 mm175 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a8.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)1.5
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2003 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

FX 5900 has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

Matrox Parhelia 256 MB, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5900 and Matrox Parhelia 256 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900
Matrox Parhelia 256 MB
Parhelia 256 MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 45 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 11 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 256 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5900 or Matrox Parhelia 256 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.