GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs FX 5900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated268
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiencyno data27.98
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV35TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 May 2003 (21 year ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed400 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors135 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20095.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2003 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

FX 5900 XT has 42.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5900 XT and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5900 XT is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
GeForce FX 5900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1612 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.