Radeon HD 8670 OEM vs GeForce FX 5900 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV35Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)8 January 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors135 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60025.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x8
Length218 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s73.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 8 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 75 Watt

FX 5900 Ultra has 27.1% lower power consumption.

HD 8670 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5900 Ultra and Radeon HD 8670 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
Radeon HD 8670 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5900 Ultra or Radeon HD 8670 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.