Tesla PG503-216 vs GeForce FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV30GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 March 2003 (22 years ago)26 November 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed400 MHz1312 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors125 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200440.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.1 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8288
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length213 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s1.13 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 250 Watt

FX 5800 has 468.2% lower power consumption.

Tesla PG503-216, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 and Tesla PG503-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla PG503-216 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800
NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5800 or Tesla PG503-216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.