Radeon RX Vega M vs GeForce FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.44
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV30Vega
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 March 2003 (23 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed400 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors125 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20038.08
ROPs48
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Length213 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 829% more advanced lithography process, and 193% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 28 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5800 or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.