Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data31.02
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV30Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 March 2003 (23 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed400 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2331 MHz
Number of transistors125 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200111.9
Floating-point processing powerno data3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Length213 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 50 Watt

FX 5800 has 14% lower power consumption.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 28 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5800 or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.