ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD vs GeForce FX 5800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNV30M71
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 March 2003 (22 years ago)1 March 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed500 MHz479 MHz
Number of transistors125 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm80 nm
Texture fill rate4.0001.916
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Length213 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz378 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s3.024 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 1 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 80 nm

ATI Mobility X2300 HD has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 Ultra and Mobility Radeon X2300 HD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon X2300 HD is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 18 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X2300 HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5800 Ultra or Mobility Radeon X2300 HD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.