GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL vs FX 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.28no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNV36NV40
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)14 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed425 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors82 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.7006.400
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP Pro 8x
Lengthno data305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz550 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s35.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)2.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 14 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt

FX 5700 has 300% lower power consumption.

6800 Ultra DDL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 and GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5700 or GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.