GRID K500 vs GeForce FX 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1515not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.31no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV36GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536 ×2
Core clock speed425 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors82 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.70095.36 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs4128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

FX 5700 has 800% lower power consumption.

GRID K500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 and GRID K500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700
NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5700 or GRID K500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.