Radeon HD 7670 OEM vs GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNV36Turks
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data480
Core clock speed475 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors82 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt66 Watt
Texture fill rate1.90019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed453 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.5 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 5 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 66 Watt

FX 5700 Ultra has 43.5% lower power consumption.

HD 7670 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and Radeon HD 7670 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
Radeon HD 7670 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 100 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7670 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5700 Ultra or Radeon HD 7670 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.