ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700 vs GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1532not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV36M76
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)12 December 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data120
Core clock speed475 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors82 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.9005.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.168 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-II
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed453 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.5 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 12 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 35 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 2700 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 31% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and Mobility Radeon HD 2700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 2700 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5700 Ultra or Mobility Radeon HD 2700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.