GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q vs FX 5700 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV36TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2003 (21 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed475 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors82 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.900no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed453 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.5 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm

GTX 1660 Max-Q has a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.