Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 196 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.26 |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | NV36S | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 August 2003 (22 years ago) | 3 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 3456 |
| Core clock speed | 425 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 82 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 158 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.700 | 432.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 27.65 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 96 |
| TMUs | 4 | 216 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 54 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 864 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 54 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 28 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 224 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 250 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | 504.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (full) 2.0 (partial) | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 August 2003 | 3 October 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 28 GB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 158 Watt |
FX 5700 Engineering Sample has 532% lower power consumption.
PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 years, a 22300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
