Quadro K2000M Embedded vs GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV36SEXK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 August 2003 (22 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed425 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1058 MHz
Number of transistors82 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1.70033.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.0 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)4.1
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2003 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

FX 5700 Engineering Sample has 80% lower power consumption.

K2000M Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.