GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI vs FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1552not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.06no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameNV31G71M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 March 2003 (22 years ago)1 June 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data54
Core clock speed325 MHz14 MHz
Boost clock speedno data375 MHz
Number of transistors80 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate1.300no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0aGDDR3
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 1 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 40 Watt

FX 5600 has 8.1% lower power consumption.

Go 7900 GS SLI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5600 and GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5600 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600
GeForce FX 5600
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5600 or GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.