Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1545not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV31Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 March 2003 (22 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors80 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60059.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s153.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2003 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

R9 270 1024SP has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5600 Ultra and Radeon R9 270 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5600 Ultra or Radeon R9 270 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.