Quadro K200M vs GeForce FX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1536not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV34 B1GK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 March 2004 (21 years ago)22 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed270 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors45 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.08013.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-A (3.0)
Length152 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2004 22 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

Quadro K200M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5500 and Quadro K200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5500 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K200M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
GeForce FX 5500
NVIDIA Quadro K200M
Quadro K200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 151 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5500 or Quadro K200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.