Quadro4 100 NVS vs GeForce FX 5200 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1484not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNV34 A2NV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 March 2003 (21 year ago)22 December 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors45 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.3001.000
ROPs42
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 4x
Length171 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x LFH60

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a8.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)1.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 22 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB

FX 5200 Ultra has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro4 100 NVS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5200 Ultra and Quadro4 100 NVS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5200 Ultra is a desktop card while Quadro4 100 NVS is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
NVIDIA Quadro4 100 NVS
Quadro4 100 NVS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 100 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.