GeForce RTX 3070 vs 9800S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated63
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.87
Power efficiencyno data18.53
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG94GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 September 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores645888
Core clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors505 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20317.4
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGAHDMISingle Link DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 220 Watt

GeForce 9800S has 193% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800S and GeForce RTX 3070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800S is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14817 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800S or GeForce RTX 3070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.