ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX SLI with Radeon HD 2400, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTX SLI
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.86
+886%

9800M SLI outperforms HD 2400 by a whopping 886% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8311402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.471.12
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXRV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)19 February 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22440
Core clock speed500 MHz398 MHz
Number of transistors3016 Million180 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.592
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03184 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz495 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.92 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Fortnite 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Fortnite 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Valorant 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Valorant 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 0.29
Recency 15 July 2008 19 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 20 Watt

9800M GTX SLI has a 886% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI HD 2400, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 51 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX SLI or Radeon HD 2400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.