Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking824not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.46no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224240 ×4
Core clock speed500 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors3016 Million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data51.84 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data32 ×4
TMUsno data80 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 600 Watt

9800M GTX SLI has 300% lower power consumption.

Plex 2200 S4, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX SLI or Quadro Plex 2200 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.