GeForce FX 5900 ZT vs 9800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking826not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.45no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXNV35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)12 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224no data
Core clock speed500 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors3016 Million135 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

9800M GTX SLI has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce FX 5900 ZT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 ZT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
GeForce FX 5900 ZT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX 5900 ZT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX SLI or GeForce FX 5900 ZT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.