Radeon R7 250XE vs GeForce 9800M GTS
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1197 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.87 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | G94 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 July 2008 (17 years ago) | 21 August 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 860 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 19.20 | 34.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.192 TFLOPS | 1.101 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 240 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2008 | 21 August 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
9800M GTS has 6.7% lower power consumption.
R7 250XE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS and Radeon R7 250XE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 250XE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
