Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 vs GeForce 9800M GTS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1190not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.87no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameG94GMA 900
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores644
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data400 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops240no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

9800M GTS has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GTS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 19 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.