ATI Radeon 9200 PCI vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking974not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.91no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX108.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

9800M GTS SLI has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PCI, on the other hand, has 436% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Radeon 9200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS SLI or Radeon 9200 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.