ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500 vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking974not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.91no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTRV200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)16 April 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz260 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data1.560
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz180 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX107.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 16 April 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

9800M GTS SLI has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS SLI or All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.