Radeon R7 430 OEM vs GeForce 9800M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG92Oland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)30 June 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed500 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors754 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0018.72
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.599 TFLOPS
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs168
TMUs4824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 30 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

R7 430 OEM has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GT and Radeon R7 430 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 430 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GeForce 9800M GT
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Radeon R7 430 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 163 votes

Rate Radeon R7 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT or Radeon R7 430 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.