ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs GeForce 9800M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG92R300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed500 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors754 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.002.600 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs168 ×4
TMUs488 ×4
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

9800M GT has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GT and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.