ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GT SLI with Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition, including specs and performance data.

9800M GT SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.89
+473%

9800M SLI outperforms X1900 CrossFire Edition by a whopping 473% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9541374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.120.25
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNB9E-GT2R580
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)24 January 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed500 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million384 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.00
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz725 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data46.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Valorant 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 0.33
Recency 15 July 2008 24 January 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 100 Watt

9800M GT SLI has a 473% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1900 CrossFire Edition, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GT SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT SLI or Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.