GeForce 210 PCI vs 9800M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1086not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG94GT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2008 (17 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6416
Core clock speed530 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors505 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate16.963.800
Floating-point processing power0.1696 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflops254no data
ROPs164
TMUs328
L2 Cache64 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2008 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 31 Watt

210 PCI has an age advantage of 11 months, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 93.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GS and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GeForce 9800M GS
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
GeForce 210 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 85 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GS or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.