Radeon RX 8800 XT vs GeForce 9800 GTX+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1119not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.64no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameG92BNavi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 January 2009 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284096
Core clock speed738 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)141 Watt220 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate47.23622.1
Floating-point processing power0.47 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs64256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 141 Watt 220 Watt

9800 GTX+ has 56% lower power consumption.

RX 8800 XT, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GTX+ and Radeon RX 8800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 147 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 149 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GTX+ or Radeon RX 8800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.