ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs GeForce 9800 GTX+

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1108not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.64no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG92BM71
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 March 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1286
Core clock speed738 MHz480 MHz
Boost clock speedno data480 MHz
Number of transistors754 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)141 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate47.231.920
Floating-point processing power0.47 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 January 2009 1 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm

9800 GTX+ has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GTX+ and Mobility Radeon HD 2300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 145 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 19 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GTX+ or Mobility Radeon HD 2300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.