Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand vs GeForce 9800 GT

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1001not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.02no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG92Whistler
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 July 2008 (15 years ago)1 July 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data
Current price$154 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112480
CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors754 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt20 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.6 billion/sec14.40
Floating-point performance336.0 gflops576.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length9" (22.9 cm)no data
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 21 July 2008 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 20 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT and Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT
AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1318 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.