Quadro4 200 NVS vs GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 July 2008 (17 years ago)22 December 2003 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed725 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors754 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate46.401.000
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2008 22 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 11 Watt

9800 GT Rebrand has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 200 NVS, on the other hand, has 1036.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and Quadro4 200 NVS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
NVIDIA Quadro4 200 NVS
Quadro4 200 NVS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand or Quadro4 200 NVS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.