GeForce2 MX 200 LP vs GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV11 B3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 July 2008 (17 years ago)3 March 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed725 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors754 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate46.400.7
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2008 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

9800 GT Rebrand has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and GeForce2 MX 200 LP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP
GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand or GeForce2 MX 200 LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.