GeForce RTX 4070 vs 9800 GT Rebrand

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.73
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameG92AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 July 2008 (15 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 $599
Current priceno data$791 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1285888
Core clock speed725 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors754 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate46.40455.4
Floating-point performance448.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2008 13 April 2023
Cost $160 $599
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 200 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and GeForce RTX 4070. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 24 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7506 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.