Radeon RX Vega XL vs GeForce 9700M GTS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1212not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG94Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483584
Core clock speed530 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1630 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate12.72365.1
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops180no data
ROPs1664
TMUs24224
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 8 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 225 Watt

9700M GTS has 275% lower power consumption.

RX Vega XL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9700M GTS and Radeon RX Vega XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9700M GTS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GeForce 9700M GTS
AMD Radeon RX Vega XL
Radeon RX Vega XL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9700M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9700M GTS or Radeon RX Vega XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.