NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS vs AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

Place in performance ranking	910	1123
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	0.01
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	no data	NB9E-GS
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2012 (11 years old)	15 July 2008 (15 years old)
Current price	$90	$230

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	656	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	655 / 450 MHz	530 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	505 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	12.72
Floating-point performance	no data	127.2 gflops
Gigaflops	no data	180

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and GeForce 9700M GTS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	51.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	no data	4.0
OpenGL	no data	3.3
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1.60
+122%

9700M GTS 0.72

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 122% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 4981
+76.3%

9700M GTS 2825

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 76% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

34
+143%

14−16

−143%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3	0−1
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Hitman 3	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1