GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs 9700M GTS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1213not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.95no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG94G98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)4 December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores488
Core clock speed530 MHz567 MHz
Number of transistors505 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate12.724.536
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
Gigaflops180no data
ROPs164
TMUs248
L2 Cache64 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 4 December 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 25 Watt

9700M GTS has an age advantage of 7 months.

8400 GS Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9700M GTS and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9700M GTS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GeForce 9700M GTS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9700M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9700M GTS or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.