Radeon RX 560DX vs GeForce 9650M GT
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1372 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.10 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | G96C | Polaris 21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 11 April 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1090 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1175 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 8.800 | 65.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0848 TFLOPS | 2.106 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 170 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 August 2008 | 11 April 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 65 Watt |
9650M GT has 183% lower power consumption.
RX 560DX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9650M GT and Radeon RX 560DX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9650M GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560DX is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
