GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1093not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameKaveriNB9P-GT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2014 (9 years ago)19 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Current priceno data$49

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19232
CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed533 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.800
Floating-point performanceno data84.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R4 (Kaveri) and GeForce 9650M GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataMXM-II

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Maximum VGA resolutionno data1920x1200

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R4 (Kaveri) 1958
+49.9%
9650M GT 1306

Radeon R4 (Kaveri) outperforms GeForce 9650M GT by 50% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 4 June 2014 19 August 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Kaveri) and GeForce 9650M GT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 9650M GT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.