Tesla X2070 vs GeForce 9650M GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1248not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.73no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG84GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2008 (18 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32512
Core clock speed625 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors289 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0041.66
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1664
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache32 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2008 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 225 Watt

9650M GS has 676% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9650M GS and Tesla X2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9650M GS is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GS or Tesla X2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.