Tegra X2 vs GeForce 9650M GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1240not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.71no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG84GP10B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed625 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1465 MHz
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0023.44
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.7501 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1616
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 15 Watt

Tegra X2 has a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 93.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9650M GS and Tegra X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9650M GS is a notebook graphics card while Tegra X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIA Tegra X2
Tegra X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 36 votes

Rate Tegra X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GS or Tegra X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.