FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce 9600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.91no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG94Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 February 2008 (17 years ago)12 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores643584 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors505 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt750 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate20.80106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.208 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs32112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cache64 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm305 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Dual-link DVI support-+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2008 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 750 Watt

9600 GT has 681.3% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GT and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GT is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
FirePro S10000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2173 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GT or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.