GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs 9600 GT Green Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiencyno data5.18
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameG94GK208
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 February 2008 (17 years ago)29 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64384
Core clock speed600 MHz1046 MHz
Number of transistors505 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2033.47
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS0.8033 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3232
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x8
Length229 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1252 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s40.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.13.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2008 29 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 49 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 93.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition and GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition
GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition or GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.